Thursday, August 10, 2017

Error-Prone DNA Repair Targeted To Active Genes By Carcinogens

By Augustus Binu, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=41205743

Here is a paper that claims that carcinogens like tobacco, UV exposure, and alcohol consumption promote error-prone DNA repair targeted to active genes, therefore having a greater impact in promoting cancer by affecting those important genes.

Another reason to avoid those carcinogens.





Wednesday, August 9, 2017

Train To Failure?

By Source, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=33634102

If Mike Mentzer (pictured at left), the champion of "heavy duty" training to failure, was still around, he’d probably not be pleased about this study. Abstract:

This study investigated the effects of a 10-week resistance training to failure on neuromuscular adaptations in young women. Eighty-nine active young women were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) repetitions to failure (RF; three sets of repetitions to failure); 2) repetitions not to failure with equalized volume (RNFV; four sets of 7 repetitions); and 3) repetitions not to failure (RNF; three sets of 7 repetitions). All groups performed the elbow flexor exercise (bilateral biceps curl) and trained 2 days per week using 70% of 1RM. There were significant increases (p<0.05) in muscle strength after 5 (15.9% for RF, 18.4% for RNF, and 19.9% for RNFV) and 10 (28.3% for RF, 26.8% for RNF, and 28.3% for RNFV) weeks of training, with no significant differences between groups. Additionally, muscular endurance increased after 5 and 10 weeks, with no differences between groups. However, peak torque (PT) increased significantly at 180°.s-1 in the RNFV (13.7%) and RNF (4.1%) groups (p<0.05), whereas no changes were observed in the RF group (-0.5%). Muscle thickness increased significantly (p<0.05) in the RF and RNFV groups after 5 (RF: 8.4% and RNFV: 2.3%) and 10 weeks of training (RF: 17.5%, and RNFV: 8.5%), whereas no significant changes were observed in the RNF group (3.9 and 2.1% after 5 and 10 weeks, respectively). These data suggest that short-term training of repetitions to failure do not yield additional overall neuromuscular improvements in young women.

Of course, there are caveats.  Does this apply only to young women?  The women were labeled as “active” – but one can argue that more advanced bodybuilders, as opposed to beginners, would require “training to failure” for optimum muscle growth.  Of course, many people, including top bodybuilders, grow muscle without training to failure, but some are these are genetically gifted people and some may be utilizing anabolic drugs. And who knows if they would have made more progress training differently.  Or, maybe not. Essentially, the “jury is still out” on this question.  I give no recommendations here.  Do what works best for you, and we will await further studies.

Monday, August 7, 2017

Controversy: Requiem For BMI?

By BruceBlaus - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=44922550

Look at this paper; abstract reproduced below.  Now, I agree that BMI is a flawed measure.  It always struck me as odd that the BMI cutoffs for normal vs. overweight vs. obese were the same for men and women, considering that the typical man is larger framed and more muscular than the typical woman of the same height, and would therefore weigh more even if of completely healthy body composition. BMI also does not distinguish between the 200 pound athlete with high muscularity and low bodyfat and the 200 pound coach potato who is extremely obese and unhealthy. So, in that sense, I agree with this paper. However, for the typical person at home trying to figure out how their weight fits on the healthy vs. unhealthy spectrum, BMI can be a useful, albeit flawed, measurement, especially if combined with the common sense considerations mentioned above, and also combined with a look in the mirror to ascertain how the weight is distributed.  The typical person is not going to have access to the tools to accurately measure specific body fat percentage; hence the utility of BMI + common sense + visual observation to make judgments about healthy vs. unhealthy weight.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW:Quetelet reported in the nineteenth century that body weight varies across adults with the square of height. Quetelet's index, now known as BMI, is accepted by most health organizations as a first-level measure of body fat and as a screening tool for diagnosing excess adiposity. Modern imaging methods now, however, indicate that BMI has limited predictive value for estimating body fat and lean mass at the individual level. The use of BMI as a measure of body composition in the clinical setting should therefore be challenged.RECENT FINDINGS:Recent studies enrolling cancer and surgical patients reported discrepant outcomes when BMI was used as a body composition surrogate. Sarcopenia, loss of muscle mass and function, which affects the elderly and those with chronic and acute diseases, is not accurately diagnosed with BMI. The distribution of adipose tissue is not characterized by BMI, specific measures of which have greater predictive value for metabolic impairments and clinical outcomes.SUMMARY:BMI, as the traditional tool for assessing malnutrition and obesity, is not appropriate to accurately differentiate between important body weight components and therefore should not be used for making clinically important decisions at the individual patient level.

Friday, August 4, 2017

Should you care



This will be a short post. 


I have been dealing with lots of unnecessary drama in the past two weeks. All caused by colleagues who either do not know how to communicate or put too much weight on someone’s opinion. 

My job has turned into this of putting fires out. Yep, this is my new job description, PFO.
 

The most recent crisis I dealt with was fueled by people who got offended by remarks/opinions of their colleagues. This happens frequently, everywhere.

I used to care about everyone’s opinion. I am trying not to be influenced anymore (the emphasis is on "trying", a work in progress ☺). 


If I truly cared about what was said about me (and I knew about it), I would have sunk in the deepest depression. There are tons of people evaluating my activities. Most of these individuals are bitter, unhappy with their lives and their accomplishments, in constant doubt and battles with their own bugaboos. In such psychological state, there is no generosity of spirit and mind. There is no constructive criticism.

Let me ask you a question. When you point out at something unsavory about someone's behavior and work (face to face or behind their back), what is your purpose? Is it to correct the situation or to propagate it? If you do not do your feedback face to face, and if you do not offer any advice on how to improve this person’s state of mind, work, qualities, then YOU ARE PROPAGATING THE ALREADY BAD SITUATION. You are increasing the inflammation of an open wound. 


Being always on the receiving end of criticism/evaluations, I have decided that I would pay attention only when the feedback comes from a person I respect and trust. There are not too many of these people around me.

Resonating with all of the recent events at work is this great animation on YouTube:

STOICISM - MEDITATIONS BY MARCUS AURELIUS ANIMATED BOOK REVIEW


The author of the video has other great works; I am almost addicted to his videos. Check them out.

Thursday, August 3, 2017

Physical Activity And Exercise As Therapies For Chronic Pain

Here is a review of studies of the effect of physical activity/exercise on chronic pain. The conclusion of the abstract:
 
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the evidence examining physical activity and exercise for chronic pain is low. This is largely due to small sample sizes and potentially underpowered studies. A number of studies had adequately long interventions, but planned follow-up was limited to less than one year in all but six reviews. There were some favourable effects in reduction in pain severity and improved physical function, though these were mostly of small-to-moderate effect, and were not consistent across the reviews. There were variable effects for psychological function and quality of life. The available evidence suggests physical activity and exercise is an intervention with few adverse events that may improve pain severity and physical function, and consequent quality of life. However, further research is required and should focus on increasing participant numbers, including participants with a broader spectrum of pain severity, and lengthening both the intervention itself, and the follow-up period.

The bottom line is that there is some evidence for improvement of pain severity and quality of life, but the studies had some flaws (e.g., small sample sizes) and so some of the effects were small and/or inconsistent. Further better and larger studies are required to ascertain the extent to which physical activity can alleviate chronic pain.

Wednesday, August 2, 2017

Daily Self-Weighing And Weight Control

At left, a different kind of weighing.  By National Geographic, Ancient Egyptians - Book of the Dead, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6851635

Daily self-weighing has been shown to be effective in weight loss control and maintenance - and prevention. The abstract summarizes the findings, including the all-important take-home message: "Daily self-weighing was associated with significant declines in BMI and body fat percent over time."  Abstract:

Daily self-weighing has been suggested as an important factor for weight loss maintenance among samples with obesity. This study is a secondary analysis that examined daily self-weighing in association with weight and body composition outcomes over 2 years among young women with vulnerability for weight gain. Women (N = 294) of varying weight status completed self-weighing frequency questionnaires and weight was measured in the clinic at baseline, 6 months, 1, and 2 years; DXA scans were completed at baseline, 6 months and 2 years. Multilevel models examined the relationship between daily self-weighing (at any point in the study) and trajectories of BMI and body fat percentage. Daily self-weighing was associated with significant declines in BMI and body fat percent over time. Future research is needed to examine causal relations between daily self-weighing and weight gain prevention. Nonetheless, these data extend the possibility that daily self-weighing may be important for prevention of unwanted weight gain.

Monday, July 31, 2017

Physical Activity Can Affect Genetic Susceptibility To Weight Gain

By Javierlayus - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=15900701

One often hears the excuse that genes makes someone overweight (note of course that humans have not undergone some sort of rapid genetic change precipitating the obesity epidemic).  It is therefore useful to know that a study has shown that to the extent that genetic differences between people can influence weight gain, that the weight gain can be "diminished by increasing physical activity."  Of course, controlling diet is usually the greatest factor in weight control, even taking genetic differences into account.  Again, genetic differences influencing weight gain have always existed; the skyrocketing expansion of waistlines and BMIs cannot be attributed to genetics as the major factor. Excerpted from the abstract:

Whether change in physical activity over time modifies the genetic susceptibility to long-term weight gain is unknown…In the combined cohorts, 4-year BMI change per 10-risk allele increment was -0.02 kg/m2 among participants with greatest increase in physical activity and 0.24 kg/m2 among those with greatest decrease in physical activity (P[interaction]<0.001), corresponding to 0.01 kg versus 0.63 kg weight changes every 4 years (P[interaction]=0.001). Similar but marginal interactions were observed for the BMI-GRS (P[interaction]=0.045). Our data indicate that the genetic susceptibility to weight gain may be diminished by increasing physical activity.

Thursday, July 27, 2017

Alzheimer's Disease-Cancer Link

First described case of Alzheimer's disease. By Unknown - Unknown, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1595297

Sometimes serious diseases have interesting co-morbidities.  Having one disease may increase or decrease your risk of getting the other.  Such co-morbidities exist between some nervous system diseases and some forms of cancer.  Not surprisingly, Alzheimer’s disease and brain cancer are positively linked, which may be due to common changes in immune function affecting brain cells, while Alzheimer’s and lung cancer are negatively associated.  It seems that changes in the mitochondria – “the powerhouse of the cell” – that increase the risk of Alzheimer’s decrease the risk of lung cancer and vice versa.  Studying the mechanisms behind such correlations can lead to new therapies for these diseases.  From the article:

Alzheimer’s disease, lung cancer, and brain cancer—all devastating, all leading public health challenges—have been thought to harbor connections at the molecular level, connections that could explain curious co-morbidities. Specifically, in cases of Alzheimer’s disease, the risk of developing lung cancer is decreased, and the risk of developing glioblastoma, a kind of brain tumor, is increased…

…“A functional analysis of the sets of deregulated genes points to the immune system, up-regulated in both Alzheimer’s disease and glioblastoma, as a potential link between these two diseases,” wrote the article’s author. “Mitochondrial metabolism is regulated oppositely in Alzheimer’s disease and lung cancer, indicating that it may be involved in the inverse co-morbidity between these diseases.”

The authors of the current paper emphasized that they intended to explain previously published findings that overexpressed genes in central nervous system diseases (Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and schizophrenia) were underexpressed in cancer (lung, colon, and prostate), and vice versa. Understanding the molecular bases of these processes, the authors suggested, could provide valuable information regarding the study of the causes of each disease and the possible design of new therapeutic strategies (drug repositioning).

Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Digital Movies In Bacterial DNA

By Credit: Rocky Mountain Laboratories, NIAID, NIH - NIAID: These high-resolution (300 dpi) images may be downloaded directly from this site. All the images, except specified ones from the World Health Organization (WHO), are in the public domain. For the public domain images, there is no copyright, no permission required, and no charge for their use., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=104228

Here is a fascinating piece of basic science, in which the gene editing CRISPR system is used to add digital black and white images and a short digital movie into the genome of a bacteria. There are implications here of using live organisms for information storage (bacteria instead of a USB drive?) and the possibilities of using the same principles for gene therapy purposes (e.g., adjusting disease-causing genes). Abstract:

DNA is an excellent medium for archiving data. Recent efforts have illustrated the potential for information storage in DNA using synthesized oligonucleotides assembled in vitro. A relatively unexplored avenue of information storage in DNA is the ability to write information into the genome of a living cell by the addition of nucleotides over time. Using the Cas1-Cas2 integrase, the CRISPR-Cas microbial immune system stores the nucleotide content of invading viruses to confer adaptive immunity. When harnessed, this system has the potential to write arbitrary information into the genome. Here we use the CRISPR-Cas system to encode the pixel values of black and white images and a short movie into the genomes of a population of living bacteria. In doing so, we push the technical limits of this information storage system and optimize strategies to minimize those limitations. We also uncover underlying principles of the CRISPR-Cas adaptation system, including sequence determinants of spacer acquisition that are relevant for understanding both the basic biology of bacterial adaptation and its technological applications. This work demonstrates that this system can capture and stably store practical amounts of real data within the genomes of populations of living cells.

Health Eating And Mortality: Confirming Common Sense

By popsique - Dieta Mediterranea, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1380032

Hopefully, readers of this blog know by now the importance of a healthy diet - emphasizing fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and unsaturated fats. However, it is comforting to have this knowledge, this common sense, legitimized by study.  Thus, read the following abstract about reduced risk of death with healthy diet consumption over time:

BACKGROUND:
Few studies have evaluated the relationship between changes in diet quality over time and the risk of death.
METHODS:
We used Cox proportional-hazards models to calculate adjusted hazard ratios for total and cause-specific mortality among 47,994 women in the Nurses' Health Study and 25,745 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study from 1998 through 2010. Changes in diet quality over the preceding 12 years (1986-1998) were assessed with the use of the Alternate Healthy Eating Index-2010 score, the Alternate Mediterranean Diet score, and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet score.
RESULTS:
The pooled hazard ratios for all-cause mortality among participants who had the greatest improvement in diet quality (13 to 33% improvement), as compared with those who had a relatively stable diet quality (0 to 3% improvement), in the 12-year period were the following: 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 0.97) according to changes in the Alternate Healthy Eating Index score, 0.84 (95 CI%, 0.78 to 0.91) according to changes in the Alternate Mediterranean Diet score, and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.95) according to changes in the DASH score. A 20-percentile increase in diet scores (indicating an improved quality of diet) was significantly associated with a reduction in total mortality of 8 to 17% with the use of the three diet indexes and a 7 to 15% reduction in the risk of death from cardiovascular disease with the use of the Alternate Healthy Eating Index and Alternate Mediterranean Diet. Among participants who maintained a high-quality diet over a 12-year period, the risk of death from any cause was significantly lower - by 14% (95% CI, 8 to 19) when assessed with the Alternate Healthy Eating Index score, 11% (95% CI, 5 to 18) when assessed with the Alternate Mediterranean Diet score, and 9% (95% CI, 2 to 15) when assessed with the DASH score - than the risk among participants with consistently low diet scores over time.
CONCLUSIONS:
Improved diet quality over 12 years was consistently associated with a decreased risk of death. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.).

An example of a healthy eating index can be found here.